Tuesday, October 6, 2009

Global Warming

While the presence of life is persistent, its diversity is always changing. If we had a time-lapse camera trained on our planet for the last four billion years, we would see continents changing their shape and jostling each other; forests expanding and contracting as icecaps and glaciers wax and wane; species rising in dominance and disappearing in extinction; the atmosphere itself changing in thickness and composition.

These changes are impossible to watch, of course, because they happen in geological time scales, the time it takes for rocks to form and erode away. The new development in planetary history is that global change is now happening in human time scales, within our lifetimes.

“Climate change is variation in either the mean state of the climate or in its variability, persisting for an extended period, typically decades or longer. It encompasses temperature increase (global warming), sea-level rise, changes in precipitation patterns and increased frequencies of extreme events. Each of these phenomena can impact on biological diversity. In fact climate change is one of the major threats to biodiversity.”
The Convention on Biological Diversity

Life as we know it – indeed, the development of human societies - has flourished because the earth’s climate has remained relatively stable for a long period of time. The earth’s climate has been relatively stable since the last Ice Age ended 10,000 years ago, perhaps the most stable interglacial period for 400,000 years (IPCCa 2001).

The earth’s climate is regulated by the natural greenhouse effect, created by an atmosphere containing greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide and methane that trap heat from the sun. The heat regulation provided by the atmosphere depends on the concentration of these gases.

The global heat balance has been changed by human use of fossil fuels such as coal and oil, which release greenhouse gases when burned. By depending on the combustion of fossil fuels for energy and transport, humans are creating an extra blanket around the earth, an additional ‘unnatural’ greenhouse effect. The present atmospheric CO2 concentration has not been exceeded during the past 420,000 years, and likely not during the past 20 million years (IPCCa 2001).

Global warming is a reality already with us. The 1990s were the warmest decade on record, about 0.6 of a degree celcius (°C) warmer than 100 years ago. Australia has warmed by 0.7 °C between 1910 – 1999, with most of this increase occurring since 1950 (CSIRO, 2001).

Small changes in global average temperature have a major impact on nature. The global average temperature during the last Ice Age 10 to 20,000 years ago, which created vast areas under ice and glaciers, was only 8–10°C cooler than today (Hadley Centre, 1999).

Similarly, we can expect increases in the global average temperature of a few degrees will have dramatic changes on local environments and climatic conditions.

By 2030, average annual temperatures in Australia will be between 0.4 – 2.0°C higher than in 1990, and by 2070 it will be between 1 – 6°C warmer (CSIRO 2001). These are dramatic changes, and they are predicted to occur within our lifetimes (see map opposite).

This wide range of warming in the CSIRO scenarios reflects uncertainty about the levels of human greenhouse emissions in the future and how quickly the atmosphere responds to greater gas levels. We can however be certain that the current warming trend will continue, at rates much faster than normal.

Animals and plants are showing us that climate change is happening:

Where animals and plants are able to live depends largely on the climate. As climate changes, scientists are seeing changes in animal abundance and

distribution; changes in body size, development, and genetics; and shifts in the timing of events, such as breeding. Some wildlife are moving away from their usual habitats as the climate warms, seeking to maintain their preferred climate by moving towards the polar regions and higher altitudes (IPCCb, 2001).

The Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the world’s scientific think-tank, says that “for animals that are exhibiting significant large-scale patterns of changes, the most consistent explanation is recent climatic change.” Two out of every three international scientific studies into the impacts of climate on plants, insects, amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammal species show new and significant climate-driven changes (IPCCb, 2001).

Throughout the world, just a few of the changes that are occurring now include:


  • 22 of 35 non-migratory European butterfly species have shifted northwards by 35 – 240 km this century (Hughes 2000).

  • The only two vascular plant species in Antarctica have increased in numbers between 1964 and 1990 when there have been warmer summers and milder winters (Hughes 2000).

  • Changes in migration patterns of birds have been noted in Europe, North America and Latin America (IPCCb 2001).

  • Populations of Adelies Penguins, which inhabit pack ice, have decreased by 22 percent as sea ice has declined; Chinstrap Penguins, which prefer open water, have increased by more than 400 percent (IPCCb 2001).

  • The massive climate-related coral bleaching event of 1998 destroyed about 16 percent of coral reefs of the world in 9 months (Wilkinson, 2000).

  • A rise in surface sea temperatures of 0.8°C over 42 years was accompanied by a decline in zooplankton abundance of 70 per cent over 20 years, and further up the food chain, a decline in Sooty Shearwater abundance by 90 per cent (more than 4 million birds) (Hughes, 2000).

PM rejects ban on climbing sacred site

PM rejects ban on climbing sacred site
ARI SHARP
July 11, 2009
Keep the walk . . . Prime Minister Kevin Rudd would like to one day climb Uluru.

Keep the walk . . . Prime Minister Kevin Rudd would like to one day climb Uluru. Photo: Glenn Campbell

THE Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd, has never climbed Uluru but says he would like to have a chance to one day, dealing a blow to a proposal to ban tourists clambering up the iconic rock.

"I've not done it," Mr Rudd told 3AW yesterday, "but I've run into people from abroad who've climbed it and have had a great experience. I've also run into people from abroad who have fallen over and done themselves great damage."

A draft management plan for the Uluru-Kata Tjuta National Park released on Wednesday proposed a ban on climbing the rock in accordance with the wishes of the traditional owners, who consider the 348-metre high rock sacred.

But Mr Rudd was unmoved, saying "it would be very sad if we got to a stage, though, where Australians, and frankly our guests from abroad, weren't able to enjoy that experience". The Prime Minister's opposition is important because any decision to ban the climb would need the support of the Environment Minister, Peter Garrett, who while not declaring his position has shown sympathy to arguments in favour of a ban.

Mr Rudd was joined in his rejection of the ban by Opposition Leader, Malcolm Turnbull, but incurred the wrath of parts of the indigenous community and the Greens leader, Bob Brown, who said it showed a lack of respect.

David Ross, the director of the Central Land Council, said: "Kevin Rudd won't be around forever. One day he'll be gone but Aboriginal people won't. They'll still be there, watching people leave tracks up over their sacred site."

Mr Ross said supporters of the climb should take into account that at least 35 people had died while scaling the rock, while many more had been injured or fallen ill. "If the climb was a road and that number of casualties was suffered within a few hundred metres of each other, some drastic action would be taken," he said.

"If people can't find it within themselves to respect the wishes of traditional owners of Uluru and support the closure of its climb, then perhaps they should consider it on safety grounds."

Asked yesterday in Sydney whether he agreed with the Prime Minister's position, Mr Turnbull said he did, noting that his party's opposition to the ban "expressed or reflected the concerns of many Australians".

Each year about 350,000 tourists visit Uluru, about a third of whom choose to climb it. Research conducted by park administrators found 98 per cent of visitors would not change their decision to come to Uluru if they were unable to climb it.

Senator Brown threw his support behind a ban, saying indigenous requests not to climb the rock should be honoured.

"We should respect the culture of the indigenous people and I think the Prime Minister should respect that culture too," he told reporters in Canberra.

"It's a breach of that faith to be continuing to say people should be able to climb the rock even though in doing so they're climbing over the spiritual sensitivity of the local indigenous people, and I don't think that's fair."

Man plunges 180ft over Niagara Falls

Man plunges 180ft over Niagara Falls — and lives

 
A MAN who plunged over Niagara Falls yesterday survived with only minor injuries, making him the first person in more than 100 years known to have gone over the North American waterfall without any protective device and live. Tourists watched in astonishment as the man, wearing casual clothes and a Parka, floated by in the Niagara River, then plunged headfirst down the 180ft waterfall.
Earlier he had been seen to climb over fencing near a lookout above the falls and slide down an embankment into the water.
After four minutes in the water Kirk Jones, 40, from Michigan, hauled himself out and saluted thousands of onlookers from the rocks below the cascade. Police arrived soon after and arrested him.
He was later charged with unlawfully performing a stunt, which carries a maximum fine of $10,000 (about £7,000). He was also charged with mischief under the criminal code of Canada. Police also led away an accomplice who had filmed the fall, raising suspicion that it had been a staged stunt.
American reality television shows are known to pay large amounts for exclusive broadcast rights to daring stunts.
“When we got down there, the guy had just got on to the rocks,” Captain Shawn Bates, of the Niagara Fire Department’s rescue unit, said. “He swam over to the rocks by himself.
“He was very co-operative. He grabbed a hunk of moss and put it in his pocket and said: ‘That’s going to be a souvenir.’ I don’t know if he was thinking quite right.”
Lynda Satelmajer, from Ontario, said that she and her family had watched the man as he prepared to get in the water and then watched him go over the falls, smiling all the way. “He seemed a bit edgy; kind of jumping around,” she said. “He walked over to where we were standing and he jumped and slid down on his backside and went over the brink. It was really freaky, actually. He was smiling.”
Water rushes over the falls, which separate the United States and Canada, at a rate of 150,000 gallons a second. Fifteen people have taken the plunge in barrels or other protective chambers since 1901; ten survived. Suicides are not uncommon, but police do not give numbers.
“I saw him disappear over the edge of the falls,” Terry McMullen, a tourist, said. Mr McMullen’s wife, Brenda, said: “He just looked calm. He just was gliding by so fast. I was in shock, really, that I saw a person go by.”
Only one other person is known to have survived a plunge over the Canadian side of the falls without a barrel or other protective gear. Sam Patch, a professional daredevil, jumped into the Niagara twice for a stunt in 1829. He died in a later stunt.
In 1960 a seven-year-old boy wearing a lifejacket also survived, having been thrown into the water in a boating accident.
No one has survived a trip over the narrower and rockier drop on the American side.


A man stabbed in the face

Stabbed in face in home invasion in Milperra

By daily telegraph
Home invasion Milperra
POLICE hunt ... Two men are in Liverpool Hospital after a home invasion at Milperra.  Picture: Bill Hearne Source: The Daily Telegraph
A MAN has been stabbed in the face and body during a home invasion in Sydney's southwest.
Police say two men, armed with knives and a baton, entered a house in Dunstan Avenue, Milperra, about 10pm yesterday.
A 22-year-old male occupant was allegedly stabbed several times, while the 50-year-old man was hit on the head with the baton.
The robbers stole some cash and a mobile phone before fleeing, last seen running east on Dunstan Avenue, police said.
The younger victim is being treated at Liverpool Hospital for stab wounds to his face, arms, body and legs, while the older man is being treated for a head wound and cuts and bruises.
They both remain stable.
The men who entered the house are described as being of white/European appearance, 20-25 years old and about 180cm tall.
Anyone with information is urged to call Crime Stoppers on 1800 333 000.



Have your say! comment about this! click the word comment at the bottom and POST!!

Planning to ban climbers climbing on the Uluru

Planning to ban climbers climbing on the Uluru
Uluru at sunset
Traditional owners have long been opposed to people climbing Uluru. (AAP)
Climbing to the top of Uluru could be banned in the near future under a proposed draft plan for the popular Central Australian tourist destination.
The Director of National Parks today released a draft 10-year management plan for the Uluru-Kata Tjuta National Park, which is visited by about 350,000 people a year, about half of whom are from overseas.
The traditional landowners have long been opposed to people climbing the 346 metre high rock, which is considered sacred.
Safety concerns have also been raised, with more than 35 deaths recorded on the climb, which can be steep, slippery and extremely hot.
At present, visitors are advised to respect the wishes of the traditional owners, but about 30 per cent of people choose to climb, many of them children.
The draft plan, which is open to public comment for the next two months, proposes to close the rock climb in the future.
"For visitor safety, cultural, and environmental reasons the Director and the Board will work towards closure of the climb," the plan states, although it says in the short-term the climb will remain open.
The plan notes that recent surveys show 98 per cent of people would not be put off visiting the area if they are not allowed to climb the rock.
It says Parks Australia will continue to work with the tourism industry to provide unique and rewarding experiences at Uluru. 
The Director of National Parks, Peter Cochrane, said it would take at least a year before a final plan for the park was approved by the Environment Minister, Peter Garrett.
It could then take many more months before the climb could finally be closed, so as not to impact heavily on the tourism industry.
"We will ensure that if there are any major changes to what we do, there will be sufficient lead time for the industry to adjust," Mr Cochrane said.
He said safety, environmental and cultural factors had played a part in the push to close the climb.
"It is very steep, very slippery, strenuous.
"It's higher than the Eiffel Tower, so up until 2000 more than 30 people had died on the climb.
"We still have over a dozen injuries and incidents every year.
"There's erosion concerns and there are no toilets on the top of the rock.
"So human behaviour up there means that we get run-off fouling water holes, and having impacts on plants and animals and the health of Aboriginal kids who play in those water holes.
"And culturally, Uluru is very significant to traditional owners."
The Tourism and Transport Forum said the preservation of Uluru has to be done in a way that respects traditional owners' wishes and takes into account the contributions the tourism industry brings to the area.
"If there was an eventual close to the climb, in line with the demands of the traditional owners of Uluru, the tourism industry would respect this position," TTF managing director, Christopher Brown, said.
"However, operators and investors would need to be given time and assistance to develop new interactive experiences which expand the park's tourism offering."
Mr Brown says it is important to ensure the move to close the climb does not hurt tourist operators.
"In ensuring a continued attraction for tourists around the country and around the world to go there, we need to look at timing, maybe compensation for operators," he said.
"We would need to look at opening up other experiences in Central Australia to increase the average length of stay for people to longer than it currently is.
"We recognise that operating in culturally and environmentally sensitive areas is a serious responsibility.
"At the same time, we want to ensure employment and economic opportunities for regional communities."